Relo PIN Code in Raigarh, Chattisgarh

Relo is located in the district of Raigarh, Chattisgarh. The pincode of Relo is 496665. The area "Relo" lies under takula of Udaipur Dharamjaigarh and has a Branch Office. Relo comes under the head office Raigarh. The postal division for pin code 496665 is Raigarh.


PIN Code 496665

Area Relo
Pincode 496665
Taluka or Tehsil Udaipur Dharamjaigarh
District Raigarh
State Chattisgarh
Office Status Branch Office
Postal Division Raigarh
Postal Region Raipur
Sub Office Chhal
Head Office Raigarh
Contact Address Postmaster, Post Office Relo (Branch Office), Udaipur Dharamjaigarh, Chattisgarh, India, Pin Code: 496665



Other Areas Nearby Relo, Raigarh with Pincode 496665


Pin code Area District Taluka Postal Status
496665 Bangursia pin code Raigarh Udaipur Dharamjaigarh Branch Office
496665 Banhar pin code Raigarh Raigarh Branch Office
496665 Barbhouna pin code Raigarh Kharsia Branch Office
496665 Barra pin code Raigarh Kharsia Branch Office
496665 Bojia pin code Raigarh Udaipur Dharamjaigarh Branch Office
496665 Chandrasekharpur pin code Raigarh Udaipur Dharamjaigarh Branch Office
496665 Chhal pin code Raigarh Raigarh Sub Office
496665 Dehjari pin code Raigarh Dharmajaigarh Branch Office
496665 Farkanara pin code Raigarh Dharmajaigarh Branch Office
496665 Gorpar pin code Raigarh Dharmajaigarh Branch Office
496665 Gurda pin code Raigarh Dharmajaigarh Branch Office
496665 Jobi pin code Raigarh Dharmajaigarh Branch Office
496665 Karaipali pin code Raigarh Dharmajaigarh Branch Office
496665 Khamhar pin code Raigarh Udaipur Dharamjaigarh Branch Office
496665 Kudekela pin code Raigarh Udaipur Dharamjaigarh Branch Office
496665 Nagoi pin code Raigarh Dharmajaigarh Branch Office
496665 Nawapara pin code Raigarh Dharmajaigarh Branch Office
496665 Pusalda pin code Raigarh Raigarh Branch Office
496665 Relo pin code Raigarh Udaipur Dharamjaigarh Branch Office

Other Localities Nearby Relo with PIN Code 496665


Note: While we try to make the pincode data as accurate as possible, sometimes there might be inaccuracy in data. Please feel free and point it out in the below comment section.